Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

doi:10.3897/ese.2022.e95926

Viewpoint

European Science Editing 48: e95926
https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e95926 (21 Dec 2022)

Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

(Catalog Number)

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

(5)

(0)

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets (2023)
Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review. Learned Publishing 36: 651.

DOI: 10.1002/leap.1579

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Jens C. Türp, Timothy Daly (2025)
Sting operations in biomedical publishing violate truthfulness and undermine trust in research. Current Medical Research and Opinion 41: 155.

DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2441340

Maryna Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2023)
Use of the Internet Archive to Preserve the Constituency of Journal Editorial Boards. Publishing Research Quarterly 39: 368.

DOI: 10.1007/s12109-023-09966-w

J. A. Teixeira da Silva (2023)
A reflection on Springer Nature’s current editorial policies related to “predatory” journals and references. Science Editor and Publisher 8: 110.

DOI: 10.24069/SEP-23-17

Payal B. Joshi, S. Minirani (2024)
Scientific Publishing Ecosystem. Chapter 18: 307.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-4060-4_18

Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories

This website uses cookies in order to improve your web experience. Read our Cookies Policy